The results presented here are encouraging, showing performance numbers that are one order of magnitude better than the ones obtained in the tool’s previous version. The present version of BTestBox uses parallelisation techniques that significantly improve its performance. Second, the tool performs the translation of lower level B specifications into programming language code, runs tests and compares their results with the expected output of the test cases. Our tool performs a double task: first, it acts on the B model, by checking the code coverage. ![]() It also generates reports with different metrics and may be used as an extension to the Atelier B. The tool uses a constraint solver to produce tests, thus being able to identify dead code and tautological branching conditions. BTestBox supports several code coverage criteria and code generators for different languages. ![]() We propose improvements for the BTestBox, a tool for automatic generation of tests for software components developed with the B method. To mitigate the risk of errors in these phases, certifications issued by regulation entities demand or recommend testing the generated software using a code coverage criteria. 2 minutes to read.In this articleMicrosoft SpecificThe LENGTH, SIZE, and TYPE operators have a limited meaning. The argument of correctness in refinement-based formal software design often disregards source code analysis and code generation. Type and Variable Sizes in Inline Assembly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |